Sometimes one of the mailing lists I'm on sends a gem my way. This is one such item:
From the Globe and Mail, September 24, 2008
What sort of country do we want to live in? What sort of country
do we already live in? What do we like? Who are we?
At present, we are a very creative country. For decades, we've
been punching above our weight on the world stage - in writing, in
popular music and in many other fields. Canada was once a cultural
void on the world map, now it's a force. In addition, the arts are a
large segment of our economy: The Conference Board estimates Canada's
cultural sector generated $46-billion, or 3.8 per cent of Canada's
GDP, in 2007. And, according to the Canada Council, in 2003-2004, the
sector accounted for an "estimated 600,000 jobs (roughly the same as
agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, oil & gas and utilities
But we've just been sent a signal by Prime Minister Stephen Harper
that he gives not a toss for these facts. Tuesday, he told us that
some group called "ordinary people" didn't care about something called
"the arts." His idea of "the arts" is a bunch of rich people gathering
at galas whining about their grants. Well, I can count the number of
moderately rich writers who live in Canada on the fingers of one hand:
I'm one of them, and I'm no Warren Buffett. I don't whine about my
grants because I don't get any grants. I whine about other grants -
grants for young people, that may help them to turn into me, and thus
pay to the federal and provincial governments the kinds of taxes I
pay, and cover off the salaries of such as Mr. Harper. In fact, less
than 10 per cent of writers actually make a living by their writing,
however modest that living may be. They have other jobs. But people
write, and want to write, and pack into creative writing classes,
because they love this activity – not because they think they'll be
Every single one of those people is an "ordinary person." Mr.
Harper's idea of an ordinary person is that of an envious hater
without a scrap of artistic talent or creativity or curiosity, and no
appreciation for anything that's attractive or beautiful. My idea of
an ordinary person is quite different. Human beings are creative by
nature. For millenniums we have been putting our creativity into our
cultures - cultures with unique languages, architecture, religious
ceremonies, dances, music, furnishings, textiles, clothing and special
cuisines. "Ordinary people" pack into the cheap seats at concerts and
fill theatres where operas are brought to them live. The total
attendance for "the arts" in Canada in fact exceeds that for sports
events. "The arts" are not a "niche interest." They are part of being
Moreover, "ordinary people" are participants. They form book clubs
and join classes of all kinds - painting, dancing, drawing, pottery,
photography - for the sheer joy of it. They sing in choirs, church and
other, and play in marching bands. Kids start garage bands and make
their own videos and web art, and put their music on the Net, and draw
their own graphic novels. "Ordinary people" have other outlets for
their creativity, as well: Knitting and quilting have made comebacks;
gardening is taken very seriously; the home woodworking shop is
active. Add origami, costume design, egg decorating, flower arranging,
and on and on ... Canadians, it seems, like making things, and they
like appreciating things that are made.
They show their appreciation by contributing. Canadians of all
ages volunteer in vast numbers for local and city museums, for their
art galleries and for countless cultural festivals - I think
immediately of the Chinese New Year and the Caribana festival in
Toronto, but there are so many others. Literary festivals have sprung
up all over the country - volunteers set them up and provide the food,
and "ordinary people" will drag their lawn chairs into a field - as in
Nova Scotia's Read by the Sea - in order to listen to writers both
local and national read and discuss their work. Mr. Harper has
signalled that as far as he is concerned, those millions of hours of
volunteer activity are a waste of time. He holds them in contempt.
I suggest that considering the huge amount of energy we spend on
creative activity, to be creative is "ordinary." It is an age-long and
normal human characteristic: All children are born creative. It's the
lack of any appreciation of these activities that is not ordinary. Mr.
Harper has demonstrated that he has no knowledge of, or respect for,
the capacities and interests of "ordinary people." He's the "niche
interest." Not us.
It's been suggested that Mr. Harper's disdain for the arts is not
merely a result of ignorance or a tin ear - that it is "ideologically
motivated." Now, I wonder what could be meant by that? Mr. Harper has
said quite rightly that people understand we ought to keep within a
budget. But his own contribution to that budget has been to heave the
Liberal-generated surplus overboard so we have nothing left for a
rainy day, and now, in addition, he wants to jeopardize those 600,000
arts jobs and those billions of dollars they generate for Canadians.
What's the idea here? That arts jobs should not exist because artists
are naughty and might not vote for Mr. Harper? That Canadians ought
not to make money from the wicked arts, but only from virtuous oil?
That artists don't all live in one constituency, so who cares? Or is
it that the majority of those arts jobs are located in Ontario and
Quebec, and Mr. Harper is peeved at those provinces, and wants to
increase his ongoing gutting of Ontario - $20-billion a year of
Ontario taxpayers' money going out, a dribble grudgingly allowed back
in - and spank Quebec for being so disobedient as not to appreciate
his magnificence? He likes punishing, so maybe the arts-squashing is
part of that: Whack the Heartland.
Or is it even worse? Every budding dictatorship begins by muzzling
the artists, because they're a mouthy lot and they don't line up and
salute very easily. Of course, you can always get some tame artists to
design the uniforms and flags and the documentary about you, and so
forth - the only kind of art you might need - but individual voices
must be silenced, because there shall be only One Voice: Our Master's
Voice. Maybe that's why Mr. Harper began by shutting down funding for
our artists abroad. He didn't like the competition for media space.
The Conservative caucus has already learned that lesson. Rumour
has it that Mr. Harper's idea of what sort of art you should hang on
your wall was signalled by his removal of all pictures of previous
Conservative prime ministers from their lobby room - including John A.
and Dief the Chief - and their replacement by pictures of none other
than Mr. Harper himself. History, it seems, is to begin with him. In
communist countries, this used to be called the Cult of Personality.
Mr. Harper is a guy who - rumour has it, again - tried to disband the
student union in high school and then tried the same thing in college.
Destiny is calling him, the way it called Qin Shi Huang, the Chinese
emperor who burnt all records of the rulers before himself. It's an
impulse that's been repeated many times since, the list is very long.
Tear it down and level it flat, is the common motto. Then build a big
statue of yourself. Now that would be Art!
Adapted from the 2008 Hurtig Lecture, to be delivered in Edmonton on Oct. 1
To the Front
|Subscribe in a reader|
- ▼ 2008 (24)